It’s easy to point the finger, isn't it? To categorize a whole experience based on a single, often negative, perception. This happens everywhere, really, but the specific case of English teachers in China seems particularly ripe for such a label. Perhaps it’s rooted in a misunderstanding, a failure to grasp the sheer scope and dynamism of this industry, or maybe it’s just a convenient way for some expats to dismiss the choice of their colleagues. We need to look beyond the surface and understand the complex tapestry that makes up the lives of these educators.
Think back to the early days, maybe even pre-pandemic, when opportunities were trickier to secure. Back then, finding work in places like the UK or Europe, especially for those without highly specialized skills or perhaps without a PhD, could indeed be a hurdle. A teaching certificate, sometimes paired with a TEFL qualification, might have been the only viable path outside of perhaps the hospitality sector or other niche jobs. So, yes, there was, and perhaps still is a thread of truth to the "unemployable back home" narrative for some. However, this reality seems vastly different now, doesn't it? The world has shrunk, and China's educational landscape has evolved significantly.
Perhaps the perception has also been shaped by a specific group – those foreigners who arrived stateside with perhaps inflated expectations or perhaps lacking the necessary qualifications for teaching in their own countries. They landed in China, armed with a TEFL or TESOL, and maybe their journey wasn't as fulfilling as they'd hoped. They might have found themselves facing challenges, perhaps feeling overwhelmed by the cultural differences or the sheer responsibility of teaching, leading to frustration and a perception of failure. Their experience, unfortunately, sometimes overshadows the vast majority who find meaning and satisfaction in their roles.
But let's not forget the sheer *demand* for English teachers. China's educational system, vast and insatiable, requires a constant influx of native speakers. While the quality can vary wildly, the sheer number needed means opportunities are abundant. Many schools, particularly the newer ones, are incredibly supportive, offering competitive salaries, accommodation, and even help with visa processing. They see teachers as valuable assets, not burdens. So, is it "loser" if someone chooses stability and opportunity abroad over hardship back home? Maybe the label is misplaced.
Furthermore, the definition of "unemployable" itself is subjective. Does a lack of a perfect academic record, a PhD, or a niche marketable skill automatically brand someone a loser? Many expats who work as English teachers are incredibly adaptable, resourceful, and resilient individuals. They bring diverse perspectives and experiences to their classrooms, often enriching the lives of their students in ways far beyond just language instruction. The stereotype often fails to recognize the unique skill set required to thrive in this environment – patience, cultural flexibility, and a genuine passion for teaching.
Then there's the question of *why* they teach. For many, it's not a fallback option, but a conscious career choice. They might be educators looking for adventure, they might be drawn by the unique cultural experience, or perhaps they simply value the opportunity to share their language and knowledge with a large, motivated group of learners. They often find teaching incredibly rewarding, seeing measurable progress in their students and gaining a deep appreciation for Chinese culture and society. Their "failure" back home, if any, might be defined by different circumstances, not by their inability to secure a teaching position in China.
Ah, but let's not ignore the flip side entirely. Some might *be* genuinely unemployable in their home countries, facing economic hardship or limited job prospects, and choose China not out of failure, but out of necessity, seeking a better life and stability. And for those who were employable, the lure of a higher salary, tax-free benefits, and a chance to live and work abroad is a powerful motivator. It’s hard to argue that someone who earns significantly more than they could back home, while potentially facing a less favorable job market, is objectively a "loser" based on that definition alone.
And then there's the travel angle. This is often a key driver for many, expats and even some Chinese teachers. The promise of weekends and holidays free from teaching responsibilities, coupled with the ease of travel *within* China – exploring scenic landscapes, visiting historical sites, or just trying a new city – is a huge part of the appeal. It’s not about losing, it's about gaining the freedom to experience a vast and diverse country firsthand. The LBH label simply doesn't capture the sense of adventure and exploration that often fuels this decision.
So, where does this leave us? The LBH perception seems like a relic, perhaps holding onto outdated views or specific negative experiences. It fails to account for the sheer volume of qualified and motivated teachers, the significant financial and professional opportunities available, the desire for adventure, and the rewarding nature of the work for many. It also overlooks the fact that "failure" is often relative, and what might seem like a setback from one perspective could be a positive life change from another. Maybe it's time to retire the label and look at the motivations and experiences of these English teachers with a more open and appreciative eye. Their choice, while different from many, is often driven by ambition, necessity, or a thirst for discovery – anything but losing.
Categories:
Everywh,
Rate and Comment
